A Villain Big and Bold – The Iowa Hawkeyes

(H/T IowaHawkeyes.net for the video)

Just thought I would share that because it’s so badass. I’m still in shock that Iowa is undefeated, but as a lifelong Iowa fan I’m prepared to ask no questions and just accept this luck while we have it. But, for some reason, I don’t believe this year’s team success is due to luck. I think it’s grit. Pure determination. This Iowa team has a few talented players, but they win by closing their eyes and jumping off the cliff every game, fully committing. If things don’t go well the first half (as is typically the case), they know they can’t just ride out the game and hope something good happens; they’re free-falling and need to do something before they crash. Somehow, every week they come up with something. A fumble. An interception or two. Twenty-eight points in the fourth quarter. Iowa avoids meeting terra firma, and starts to quickly gain some altitude.

Jamie and I just watched Casino, and the Hawkeyes remind me of what Robert DeNiro’s character, Sam Rothstein, says about Joe Pesci’s character, Nicki Santoro:

No matter how big a guy might be, Nicky would take him on. You beat Nicky with fists, he comes back with a bat. You beat him with a knife, he comes back with a gun. And if you beat him with a gun, you better kill him, because he’ll keep comin’ back and back until one of you is dead.

Iowa keeps getting beaten in the first half, even the first three quarters, only to get up, dust off some dirt, look their opponents in the eye, and smile a little bit. They smile because they know they’ve won; it’s the fourth quarter and they’re not dead yet. Michigan State was close. Michigan was close. Indiana was really close. In fact, eight out of nine teams were close. But they never finished the job. They had Iowa down, but we just kept comin’ back.

Let’s hope this continues. Casino didn’t end very well for Nicki Santoro, but only because he got cocky. And, if anything, we all know Iowa isn’t cocky.

Iowa isn’t getting much respect from the national sports media (and certain cocky Alabama fans at law school). I think critics should underestimate the Hawks at their own peril. There’s something intangible about this team that makes them dangerous. Maybe it’s the very, “Come on, give me your best shot!” attitude that I described above. Whatever it is, for many college football fans out there, Iowa is prepared to play the villain this season.

My Prediction for the Iowa Game Tomorrow

PWNED!

PWNED!

The Iowa Hawkeyes, rumored to be Superbowl contenders, are 7-0. While not every game has been pretty, the victories have been just as sweet.I predict we beat MSU this weekend 31-14. I have little to base my prediction on other than this:

And this::

And, of course, this:

To keep going would just be overdoing it…

Sorry, that was the last one, I swear.

In their honor, I bring you some highlights from the season so far:

Videos were found on IowaHawkeyes.net and the PWNED! pic was found on BlackHeartGoldPants.com, two blogs I check regularly to get my fix on Iowa Football.

Why am I a Republican? – Let’s ask Sen. Snowe

That’s the question the new GOP.com website is asking, and it’s the question that Sen. Olympia Snowe should be asking herself today after her indefensible vote today to condemn Americans to a future full of higher taxes, lower quality health care, and rationing. Maybe we should all email Sen. Snowe’s office and ask her to fill out the simple form on GOP.com to remind us why she is a Republican….Go ahead.

I’m never one for kicking people out of the party; I’m just not. I think it’s stupid to purposefully boot people off the team, when the only way to win the game is to have a bigger roster than your opponent. But at some point, all of the teammates need to look around and ask why they’re playing for the Republican Party. Someone compromising on a particular issue here or there is a necessary consequence of having a big tent party. Even some of the best conservatives in the party slip up here and there. Not every issue is central to the Republican Party’s or conservative movement’s purpose, and some issues may even have viable conservative arguments available on more than one side. Take the Patriot Act for instance: probably most conservatives argue in favor of it from a national security perspective, while others argue against it because they fear the erosion of individual liberties.

But some positions are so central to the purpose of the Republican party that taking a different position calls into question why you’re even a Republican at all. A vote for the “stimulus” bill is a great example. The whole point of the Republican Party is to advocate for limited government and stand in opposition to wasteful government spending. If you can’t agree on that, then you simply are not a Republican. That’s it. There is no more central purpose to our party than standing for the individual and limited government. There simply wasn’t anything about the “stimulus” bill that should’ve been appealing to any Republican (ahem, Charlie Crist).

The health care bill is another one of these core issue votes, for multiple reasons. The bill raises taxes on millions of Americans (core issue), grossly expands government involvement in the private sector (core issue), takes away the freedom of individuals to make decisions for themselves (core issue), permanently increases government spending on entitlement (core issue), and on and on.

On top of this, how naive do you have to be (Sen. Snowe), to actually fall for the budget trickery the Democrats have built into this non-bill (what’s being called a vapor bill)? Let’s make the assumption that all the numbers in the bill are honest estimates of real costs and revenues, and that the projected cost of the bill is actually $829billion over ten years. First, history has taught us that federal entitlement programs always cost more (often far more) than they were projected to cost when they were first created. When Medicare was created in 1965, it was projected to cost just(!) $12 billion. When 1990 actually rolled around, Medicare cost a whopping $100 billion. It is nothing but willful blindness to pretend that this situation is different.

Putting aside that scenario, can anyone honestly believe that the numbers included in the Baucus bill are honest? The biggest example is how the bill remains “deficit neutral” by using ten years of revenue to cover only seven years of expenditures. Get that? They’re going to tax you for three years before the bill takes effect to make it look like the first ten years don’t cost anything. After the first ten years, we will begin to see the true costs of the legislation kick in, and, according to the CBO’s report, we still will have over 25 million uninsured Americans.

For someone to pretend (Sen. Snowe) that this massive expansion in government control over health care is nothing more than the next step in the nation’s slow slide into a single-payer health care system represents a total disregard for precedent.

The only possible justification for Sen. Snowe’s vote today would be in the off chance that she is a super-calculating person who plans on magically exerting more than her fair share of influence in the merger discussions, thereby dragging the bill so far to the middle that she knows liberal senators won’t vote tolerate it, and perhaps the bill will fail before it reaches the president for a signature. The odds of this being her line of thinking: 5%.

Outside of the remote chance that, through some sort of Machiavellian maneuvering, Sen. Snowe believes she is actually dooming the bill by voting it out of committee (and then has the ability to actually follow through and doom the bill), her vote today was totally unacceptable.

Like I said at the beginning, I’m not one to kick people out of the party. But I am certainly one to hold people in our party accountable when they start acting like Democrats. Sen. Snowe voting for the health care bill today because it’s “historic” is no excuse for ditching every core principle of the party. How many other bills would have been “historic”, but were also terrible ideas? Either you believe in the principles of the party, and believe that taking certain positions is necessary for the betterment of the country, or you can be a Democrat and just vote how the polls say you should vote.

Again: Maybe we should all email Sen. Snowe’s office and ask her to fill out the simple form on GOP.com to remind us why she is a Republican.

9/11 Memories – Mine vs Kids’ Today

I was in high school in 2001 and I remember what happened on September 11th eight years ago. I recall walking through the hallways after the first plane hit and thinking, “What kind of idiot pilot can’t see a 100-story building in the middle of a city?” Quite obviously, and justifiably, my brain did not immediately assume that NYC was suffering the greatest terrorist attack in history.

When we got to our next class, we turned on the television to check the news before class started. The second plane hit and the teacher went to turn of the TV. Under protest from the students she kept the TV on and we watched, our jaws slacked and eyes watering, in realization that we were no longer witnessing an interesting and tragic news story, but instead a history-making mass-murder, a terrorist act, and something that would change our country forever. The bell rang and we shuffled to our next class. All we did the rest of the day was watch TV, mourn the loss of untold thousands, and hypothesize about what was going to happen next.

I was walking through the hallway when someone told me about a rumor that the Pentagon had been bombed. Other people were saying the White House was evacuated, that President Bush couldn’t be found and no one knew where Air Force One was. Hearing that other flights were in the air was terrifying. All I could think was that some small, previously obscure country was about to become famous right before it disappeared off the map. I was partly right.

I was into current events then as I am now and so people started asking me what I thought would happen next. I had no idea, but I said I had a hunch Iraq was involved. This turned out to be mostly untrue (they weren’t directly involved in 9/11, I know, but they did help support the international structure of terrorist organizations and they were soon enough part of the War on Terror). Interestingly, most people I was talking with had the same first thoughts.

I went home and watched news coverage until early in the morning. I can’t find the picture anywhere, but I remember an image of hundred of ambulances lined up on a bridge going into New York City. That was maybe the saddest image I’ve ever seen. Thousands of people ready to help survivors from the collapsed towers, but there weren’t any to help.

Schools canceled sporting events because no one was sure what would happen next. Looking back, it was a bit ridiculous to cancel football games in West Des Moines, IA, but who knew that at the time? Maybe the next wave of attacks was going to hit small communities – places where people felt safe. Of course, a second wave never came, and still hasn’t because of the tremendous efforts of our military, the intelligence and law enforcement communities, and the Bush administration.

Those are my memories. What’s really weird for me is when Jamie comes home from teaching and talks about all the kids in her class. Mostly seven and eight year olds, they weren’t even born when 9/11 happened. I ask Jamie if they talk about it in class, and she says some teachers do, and some don’t. One teacher has a 9/11 kids book to help her explain what happened. How do you relate such stories to kids whose worlds are so small and simple?

Studying history can often be abstract. You read about a battle in the Middle Ages where tens of thousand of people died or look at pictures of men on the moon, and you are never able to grasp the emotional sense that contemporary people experienced. Going through 9/11 (and not even having been in NYC or DC at the time) was traumatic and impactful. But kids who were five years old when it happened, or not even born yet, will never experience that. I had a 9/11 documentary playing the background the other day and even I commented to Jamie that it felt like watching something about Pearl Harbor. Still, reading things like this is really frustrating.

This is why it’s so important to consciously remind ourselves of the importance of such events – to never forget and never allow history to repeat itself. It’s also why it’s so disappointing for our current leaders in Washington to consciously try to put such events behind us, out of our collective consciousness. Calling terrorist acts “man-made disasters” and declaring the War on Terror over in favor of “overseas contingency operations”, diminishes the importance of historical events, and falsely lulls people into a sense of complacency.

It’s not fear mongering to remind people of real-life dangers. In fact, for our government not to do so, and instead pretend that everything is just fine, would be, and is, irresponsible. We are still in danger of more attacks. We are still fighting the same battles overseas that we have been for the past eight years. Renaming things to sounds more tolerable just makes it harder for our government to keep our nation safer; harder to remind people of the terrible intentions of our enemies.

September 11th, 2001 – Never Forget, Never Surrender. I never will.

Republicans are Optimists, Democrats are Pessimists

If there’s one thing I feel really crystallizes the differences between Republicans/Conservatives and Democrats/Liberals, it’s how these two groups approach the future. Republicans are optimists about things to come and Democrats are generally pessimists. This really shows in the solutions the two parties propose to today’s public policy problems. I bet there’s a lot of people, mostly liberals, that would disagree with that, but it’s really undeniable if you’re able to separate yourself from the minutia of legislation and look at what Republicans and Democrats are really saying about the events of tomorrow.

It thought of this as I read a post by Mary Katharine Ham, which included the following quote from endangered Colorado Democratic Congresswoman Betsy Markey as she spoke about health care reform:

“There’s going to be some people who are going to have to give up some things, honestly, for all of this to work,” Markey said at a Congress on Your Corner event at CSU. “But we have to do this because we’re Americans.”

Let’s delve into this some.

While talking about the health care system in America, a system that is in undeniable need of reform to control the skyrocketing costs of care, Democrats have proposed giving government much greater control over the system through the creation of a public option (read: stealth single-payer plan) and a whole host of new regulations and mandates. Congresspeople such as Rep. Markey support these ideas because their first inclination when confronted with any problem is to raise taxes and bring into existence a massive new layer of government bureaucracy that will force every American into the same mold.

Of course, a natural effect of forcing end-equality on everyone is that for every winner, there is likely to be a loser. Thus, Rep. Markey refers to the fact that, “…some people…are going to have to give up some things,” because there would be no way to just magic into existence enough resources to give everyone the absolute best option. And who will decide who gives up what and to whom? The government will tell you. We will all be a little below average.

Democrats advocate policies like this because they are pessimists. They believe that things simply won’t get better. There won’t be new technological innovations. Smart people won’t figure out a new business model that provides consumers with more for less. We are stuck in time, and so we need the government to step in and split up all these limited resources between everyone because they are the only objective entity in the process (Ha!), and these resources are only going to get more and more limited as more people enter the system.

Democrats believe this is the American Way – that the American Dream is for everyone to end up equally stuck in the same situation. Now you can see how Rep. Markey actually believes the disturbing things she says – “But we have to do this because we’re Americans.” What kind of vision is that? She sees a country where we all suffer equally. Sad. Democrats: “We must all live crappily together and sacrifice things very dear to us because America stinks.”

The results of thinking this way (more government, more taxes, less ) are limiting, but two things are usually guaranteed, neither of which is actually solving the problem:

  1. The problem will continue to exist forever, and will likely get much worse. It will never be solved because the government has now institutionalized it. There is no incentive for the government to cure the nation of its ills, just to treat the symptoms as long as they persist – and in many instances, much longer than is necessary.
  2. The American people now actually have fewer means to try and solve the problem for themselves. Every new government burden (financial and otherwise), takes resources out of the system, in turn leaving people and businesses with less resources with which they can improvise, innovate, and experiment. Less for R&D, and less room for Americans to feel financially comfortable enough to try new things.

But, don’t despair, oh pessimist! There is another way!

Conservatives and Republicans are optimists. We believe that things don’t always have to be this way – they can get better! In fact, let’s make them better. Of course, to have something better than what you have now, you must have a choice between two or more options – so let’s free businesses large and small to try some new things and then free consumers to pick the ones that are best for them.

Too many people and not enough food? I’d be willing to bet some family farmers and major agricultural companies will find a way to make more (Hint: that’s already happening). Not enough oil? Energy companies are finding some really amazing new ways to squeeze oil from rocks (literally), and at the same time are investing huge amounts in renewable energy.

Health care cost too much? Let’s not accept that things can’t get better. Let’s not relegate ourselves to a permanent existence in the present. Let’s not institutionalize our problems in a tangled web of government bureaucracy.

Instead, how about we free the market up some to let consumers purchase health insurance across state lines. Allow people to buy inexpensive, high deductible policies (illegal in many states because they impose so many different types of mandates on insurance providers such as maternity care for 80 year old women and free visits to dietitians) and match them with tax-free Health Savings Accounts.

Imagine how much prices would come down if health insurance companies were allowed to compete like car insurance companies. There would be 100 companies in every state, and each company would have to compete on price to survive. Progressive Auto Insurance allows customers to name a price they can afford and then builds a custom policy for them. This would be illegal for millions of people trying to get health insurance in today’s system.

Why not give taxpayers the same tax incentives to buy insurance that are given to businesses? Why not allow small businesses and associations to pool together when buying insurance? Why not finally (!) enact some strict tort reform to prevent frivolous lawsuits against doctors who are paying through the nose for malpractice insurance.

There’s plenty of things to do besides accept that things will always suck, and so we should just chop up the suckiness and pass it around.

While Democrats want to hit the pause button and equally divide up what we have, Republicans wish to light the fires of progress and put America to work in finding a solution to the problems that confront us. Democrats see a tomorrow that’s a lot like today, just more equally split up. We’ve reached our potential and it’s just the right thing to do to give up most of what you have for the greater good.

Republicans don’t believe that this is as good as it gets; that we can do better than this. We don’t have to accept that today’s problems are going to last forever – we can solve them. We can progress.

You tell me which party’s full of optimists.

Transformers 2, the F-22, and President Obama

I feel like I first have to qualify this post by stating publicly that I don’t watch every single movie through a political prism. Really, I view movies as a time to relax and just enjoy a good show. Sometimes they are meant to have overt messages, and so it’s unavoidable that I read some sort of political message into them, but usually I just want to disconnect from everything for a bit.

For those of us who have seen Transformers 2, you likely noticed that they mentioned President Barack Obama by name. I don’t really remember this happening in any other movie. In Transformers 1, they had President Bush with his back turned saying something ridiculous and cowboy-ish, and I recall in other movies seeing pictures or other references to a contemporary president. But, I don’t remember a sitting president being named in a movie. There’s certainly nothing wrong with it happening; it just caught my attention.

And so, having been reminded of the political world, my mind wandered for a bit, and it occurred to me that President Obama nearly cost us the war against the Decepticons by canceling the F-22 program.

Maybe you didn’t follow that huge leap there, so let me circle back.

The Decepticons – the bad guy Transformers – came to earth, looked around at our military technology, and picked the best stuff to fight us and the Autobots with. They could have picked the F-15, the Russian Su-30 or Su-37, or any other fighter jet, but they picked the F-22 Raptor because it kicks ass.

Now, about the same time in this alternate reality, President Obama is looking around the US for ways to spend some money. There’s plenty of options (trillions in fact), and he decides to throw some cash at Wall Street ($350 billion+), dump some money into union coffers ($787 billion+), pour some more into the auto industry (I lost track), send a bunch overseas to China ($Priceless), and then propose going further into debt to pay for everyone’s government-run health care ($1-2 trillion). He even spent some in Iraq, pissing off the far-Left. But after all of this, he doesn’t think it necessary to spend a measly $1.75 billion to guarantee American air-superiority for the next generation by producing the F-22 fighter.

Our F-15’s were designed and mostly built in the 1960’s and 1970’s, and have an average age of over 25 years. Recently, there have been numerous crashes involving F-15s that are literally disintegrating. In addition, other countries are rapidly catching up in the fighter jet arena. India, China, Russian, and others are expanding their air forces at record rates and with planes that are better than ours.

While the American fleet of air-superiority fighters ages and deteriorates, and our enemies build more and more sophisticated fighter aircraft, Obama cancels the F-22 and we nearly lose to the alien Decepticons. Way to go.

There is also the weeny guy in the movie that has been sent directly from the Obama Administration to overrule the military and negotiate with the Decepticons – genius! and oh, so familiar – but he is ejected from a plane into Egypt and never paid attention to again…

What I’m Learning in Law School

So, I’m rounding out my first week in law school tomorrow (DU doesn’t have Friday classes, which is both good and bad), and I have some observations on my experience so far:

1) While the material can sometimes be frustrating, it is also in some strange way satisfying. It’s like solving a puzzle every time I figure out how to apply a law, or catch some lingual trick in a Civ. Pro. Rule.

2) The work load is hard to handle, but not overwhelming. Everyone warned my I would be washed away in a sea of legalese, and at times I can feel the undertow, but so far, so good. I’m not totally confused or behind, and that’s good. Of course, it’s only week one…

3) Everyone in law school is smarter, but even here, there is a bottom half to the class. I’m in no position to judge (yet) because I will likely be stumped someday in class, but some people really seem to be struggling with some basic stuff. Who’s to say how I’ll be doing next week or the week after, but I feel like I’m getting most everything, even when some people aren’t.

4) Not everyone in law school is a prick. This is something I actually worried about before getting here. You hear everyone’s competitive, cutthroat, and ambitious. While everybody seems more focused than in undergrad (remember that Wednesday night before the final when…), most of them, not all, seem like good people.

5) There’s a hundred ways to do everything. This applies both to the law and to studying the law. I think I’ve found my system on how to organize the flood of information, but I guess I won’t know for sure until finals. The more interesting part is weeding the crap law out from the good stuff (see: judicial activism).

6) There is free time. Just not much of it. Like a few minutes a day, so far. Having Fridays off of class will be nice, but that just means we squeeze more class time in Monday-Thursday. Bottom line: I still have time to tell ugly truths about Will Crosswell to the entire Twitterverse, but I don’t have time for a nightly bottle of wine and a movie with Jamie anymore. Sad.

7) The sun will come up tomorrow…as long as I do my Civil Procedure reading. If not, brace yourself.

8 ) People seem to be getting used to the reading, but everyone has a quiet anxiety about our first writing assignments. I view it as just something to get done so I can make whatever mistakes I will inevtiably make on my first go-around, and can learn and move on. But yes, I’m a little nervous too.

9) Nothing has been more beneficial to me in establishing some confidence in law school than my last two years of experience running the CRNC out in Washington. I had to interact with lawyers many times, and that allowed me to peer into the legal profession and legal minds before entering law school. Just running the organization taught me to think quickly while also appreciating the need to accurately process the facts in front of me. Nothing prepares someone for life like throwing them in…and then saving them when they inevitably drown…No, no, I meant to say experience is invaluable.

10) Professors are liberals. Lawyers are liberals. Professors who teach the law are…

Overall, I’m happy with law school. Yes, classes are going to be hard. Yes, my professors are liberal, but they seem like great people so far. Hey, some of my really good friends are liberals. We’ll see how these three years go, but for now I’m happy I decided to come to law school. Only about 1,000 days until I know if I pass the bar…

Our Wedding in 3:03 – Montage!

I compiled all the pictures from our wedding in the a three minute, three second photo montage. I think I might add a soundtrack later, but for now here it is:

Adding to the Family

While we Smith’s are quite a large group already (over 3 million in the US!), it never hurts to add to the clan and this July 17th, that’s exactly what I did. Jamie Riese (@JamieRiese on twitter) is now Jamie Smith (@JamieSmith is already taken – boo!).

The Wedding

Our wedding couldn’t have been more perfect. The ceremony was outdoors at the Inverness Hotel and Resort south of Denver, and the reception was inside afterward. About 100 of our closest friends and relatives were kind enough to come and celebrate with us – some traveling quite a long ways to get there. It was fantastic. The weather was perfect, the food was great, and it was really good to see everyone together having fun. Jamie and I are so happy together and we can’t wait to see what all we can accomplish moving forward.

Of course, for most people the best part of weddings is the open bar, but for the groom there is a special part of the day that will never be topped by anything. When Jamie walked through the doorway into the summer light in her white dress, parents on either side, I couldn’t help it, but I welled up a little bit. She was just so beautiful – something I’ve known for a long time, but seeing her in that dress was incomparable. The pastor whispered in my ear, “This is a moment you will never forget,” but he didn’t need to tell me that. I told Jamie later that it felt like time had stopped for just a brief moment, as if God had just noticed how beautiful a creature he had put on Earth for me and wanted to take in the scene for just a bit longer himself.

A few recommendations if you’re going to be getting married in CO:

DJ/Photographer: We used ABC-MVP for our DJ and photographer. Overall I’d give them a B. They were perpetually slow in returning emails, which I view as totally unprofessional. If you have an email address that you provide to customers, be prepared to check and answer those emails daily if not hourly. Really, companies like this could benefit a lot from a complete social media strategy (imagine finding your wedding photographer on facebook because friends are recommending them), but whatever. They also had us spend about two hours picking every single song we wanted to be played at the wedding…only to play just a handful of them and then proceed to play song we specifically didn’t want. I’d be more pissed about this except for the fact that our assigned DJ got sick the night of our wedding and so they sent the owner to run the show. This excuses part of the screw-ups, but he was also the one that we had personally given all the instructions to, so he should’ve known what we wanted. The photographer was great on the scene, and we really like our pictures for the most part. We wish there were some different ones here and there, but they were good and unlike many companies they will give us all our pictures on a CD so we can have them and print new ones when we want to.

Inverness: We loved in the Inverness. They were professional in every way and great guides through the process. Our cake, bridal suite, and hotel room were included, and the family and bridal party’s rooms were given at a great discount. Judy, our wedding point person, was a big help. I’d give the Inverness an A-.

Flowers: We went with a small mom and pop flower place that Jamie met at a bridal show with her mom. She was very friendly and helpful. Overall, we really enjoyed her and the flowers were beautiful. It really pains me when we love everything up to and including the service provided for the event only to have the relationship tank during the billing phase, but that’s what happened here. They charged us an additional $50 for services that we didn’t request and they didn’t even provide. When Jamie brought it up with them, they refused to refund it saying they “couldn’t”. Uh, what? You own the company, just run a refund on your credit card machine. It’s only $50 and in the grand scheme of things isn’t a huge deal, but it shouldn’t be a big deal to the company either. We’re trying to really save money here, and that $50 could go a long ways for us. It’s too bad that we won’t ever be recommending her services to anyone else because of this small, and easily reconcilable thing.

The Honeymoon

We went down to the Riviera Maya in Mexico for the honeymoon to the all-inclusive Iberostar Paraiso Lindo. It was really fun and very relaxing for both of us. Before we left we were checking the weather every day and weatherchannel.com was warning about thunderstorms every day. Upon arrival weather reports were saying the same thing. But every day ended up being nearly perfectly sunny and HOT. Like really hot. But that’s what we wanted. We went on a snorkeling trip to Cozumel, which was awesome, jet skied off the beach, spent an evening and night in Playa Del Carmen, and lounged around by the pool (and in-pool bar). It was just really nice to think about nothing for a few days after the wedding and before both of us start school again in a few weeks. And to our worried parents: we didn’t catch Swine Flu or get kidnapped by Mexican drug gangs, but thanks for the concern.

All for now. I’ll try to post some about law school before that get’s started and I’ trying to get Jamie to guest blog soon too.

On Star Trek

Two words: Nailed it.

JJ Abrams did the impossible – he made Star Trek badass. Even more badass than Tierra (that’s for you, Will). I was hoping it would be good. I like good action movies and good sci-fi stuff and the reviews were good, so I was expecting that it would be entertaining. I haven’t been this blown away since Hillary won New Hampshire.

JJ Abrams just kicked George Lucas’s butt up and down the street, and I hope George knows it. This coming from someone who was never really interested in Star Trek and was a big fan of the Star Wars series (well, that’s all relative I suppose – the only way you’d see me at a convention for Star Wars is if this kid brought me).

Everything I wanted the most recent Star Wars movies to be (and for a long time pretended they were), this Star Trek movie was. It completed me. It had the humor without the hokeyness; the epic action scenes uninterrupted by goofy animated baffoons; the powerful rise of important characters without ridiculous lines smacking me in the face. Lucas lost his edge on Episodes I-III or maybe his originals weren’t really George Lucas’s style. Either way, I hope they make the last three Star Wars in about five years, I really do. I just don’t want Lucas directing them.

If the movie violated any of the Star Trek mythology, then that mythology sucks and I subscrive to this newer, better version. It’s a movie that will appeal to young and old, guys and girls, fans and…me. Hell, if the sequel is this good I might have to buy a Spock t-shirt…

By special request: my favorite scene was when old-Spock said, “Live long and prosper” – gotta love the golden oldies. Second Place goes to the Enterprise emerging from the blackhole. Game on.